Re: [boost] Adding detection of [u]intptr_t to Boost.Config (moving it from cstdint.hpp)

Except even a conforming stdint.h (or cstdint) is not required to provide uintptr_t/intptr_t (or std::uintptr_t/std::intptr_t). The standard should ideally have specified macros to allow C++ developers to detect whether the implementation has chosen to provide those types, in my opinion. However, since it does not, nothing inhibits Boost (especially Boost.Config) from solving that problem for developers (and not just fellow Boost library developers).

Ah, OK go for it. John.