On Saturday 01 November 2008 15:22, Stjepan Rajko wrote:
Hello all,
The review for the Signals2 library (formerly known as thread_safe_signals) submitted by Frank Mori Hess begins today (Nov
As requested earlier by Vincent, I threw together a little benchmark program (attached) comparing the speed of boost.signals with signals2. It produces the following output on a P4 running Linux: boost::signals2::signal, 1 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.20 s boost::signal, 1 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.26 s boost::signals2::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.77 s boost::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.91 s boost::signal, 1 connections, tracking enabled, invoking 1000000 times: 0.28 s boost::signals2::signal, 1 connections, tracking enabled, invoking 1000000 times: 0.72 s boost::signal, 10 connections, tracking enabled, invoking 1000000 times: 0.78 s boost::signals2::signal, 10 connections, tracking enabled, invoking 1000000 times: 4.92 s boost::signals2::signal, connecting 1000000 connections then disconnecting: 0.87 s boost::signal, connecting 1000000 connections then disconnecting: 2.13 s