Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
As I said, it does. With Boost.Local, you can still call polymorphic functions on the variables captured from scope without specifying the types of the arguments.
I am thinking to provide the type of the bound parameters within the local function body as `<BOUND_PARAM_NAME>_type`. This way you can use such types to check concepts, etc...
Is there value in this?
Yes sure. What about adding a macro BOOST_LOCAL_TYPEOF that hides the name of the type and will allow you to change it if some constraints force appear in the future? Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/local-Bound-types-for-concepts-etc-tp3302... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.