27 Feb
2006
27 Feb
'06
3:51 p.m.
John Maddock writes:
Didn't we decide that flags for conformance should always be in the form of
BOOST_NO_some-conforming-c++-feature
so that unless something special is done, the assumption will be that the compiler conforms?
Absolutely: however BOOST_TT_HAS_CONFORMING_IS_CLASS_IMPLEMENTATION was one of yours I believe
That was one of mine actually; I'm pretty sure I've introduced it before we've agreed on the above, though. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering