Re: [boost] [range] irange is not very eloquent

vicente.botet wrote:

Maybe you can tell what is the type of ???

integer_range< ??? > lower_case = irange<char>('a','z'+1);

Is it not iterator_range, rather than integer_range? I don't really get why all of Neil Groves' iterators are in a range_detail namespace either, since they don't particularly feel like implementation details, and obviously it prevents declaring variables of that type without auto. A range is just an iterator_range<some_iterator> (at least with the current Boost.Range design), so the iterator is quite central to the functionality and should be part of the public interface, IMHO.