3 Feb
2009
3 Feb
'09
4:51 p.m.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 01:30, Nigel Stewart <nigels@nigels.com> wrote:
In addition to the specialised adaptors in the boost iterator library, does it make any sense to add:
static_cast_iterator const_cast_iterator dynamic_cast_iterator
...iterator adaptors providing embedded static_cast<>, const_cast<> or dynamic_cast<> when dereferencing? (Rather than just throwing them straight on the scrap heap...)
It seems like they would just be transform_iterator with ll_whichever_cast. Is providing them separately worth it?