On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote:
3) [MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL] This thread is about "should new libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03" be considered for admission in Boost or not. It's not about the usefulness of Local, namespace, struct, Phoenix, etc. Let's all try to provide the review manager with this piece of information about C++11, C++03, and Boost.
But I've already done that part -- see my first response.
I responded to your post because you brought up the comparison with Phoenix. I don't know if you noticed but the context of my whole reply was exactly that, the relationship between C++11, C++03, and Boost where the case in point is the Local library under review.
OK, can you please summarize your position with respect to C++11 and C++03 libraries here for me once again? Just a couple of sentences will be enough. Thanks a lot :)
Here it is: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/225871 Cheers :) -- Dean Michael Berris http://goo.gl/CKCJX