Hi, I would like to get some clarification, so please correct me if I'm wrong. The first feature listed in the boost::fsm documentation is "straightforward transformation from UML state chart to executable C++ code". Since straightforward is in the eye of the beholder, I think the following would convey more information : "Direct mapping of UML state elements to boost::fsm elements for simple but manual transformation from UML state chart to executable C++ code." This would seem to be in agreement with your addition comment that no code generator is required. I am confused why having no code generator is considered a feature. It would seem the reverse is a feature, because a code generator would save coding time and eliminate human translation errors. Thanks, "Andreas Huber" <ah2003@gmx.net> wrote in message news:c8ogtj$npe$1@sea.gmane.org...
Dear Boosters
I think boost::fsm has finally reached a state that is worthy of a formal review.