On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:58:20PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:11:51AM -0500, John Eddy wrote:
Thank you Jonathan and Tony,
Fortunately, the class in which I am using this construct is templatized so the initializations as you (Tony) suggested are fine appearing just below the class. If it weren't a templatized class, doing so would produce multiply defined symbol errors. I suppose the only way around that is to have an implementation file which requires a library be built, etc. yes? (bummer)
Actually - there's at least one other option, don't define the member and require users of the header to add a definition somewhere in their program. That's probably an excellent way of ensuring noone ever uses your header ;) jon -- "I find the Law of Fives to be more and more manifest the harder I look." - Lord Omar Khayyam Ravenhurst