11 Oct
2005
11 Oct
'05
8:35 p.m.
Larry Evans <cppljevans@cox-internet.com> writes:
On 10/09/2005 07:19 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
Larry Evans <cppljevans@cox-internet.com> writes: [snip]
Okay; this one is better. But please post a unified diff next time. They're much easier to evaluate than this style.
cvs diff -du ...whatever...
Then should item 2.2 on:
http://www.boost.org/more/bugs.htm
be changed to reflect this suggestion? I.e. replace:
context diffs format (diff -c);
with:
unified diff format (cvs diff -du)
I would say yes, but now I'm not so sure, since I imagine somebody wrote "-c" very intentionally. Comments? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com