"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> wrote in message news:m1d5sjfh5l.fsf@tulip.office.meta... Thorsten Ottosen writes:
"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com> wrote in message
| if we're going to consider updating any of the algorithms, why can't we | somehow update them all so that somealg(c.begin(), c.end(), morepossibleargs) | means exactly the same thing as: | somealg(c, morepossibleargs) | ?
Don't worry; I'll propose this as part óf my submission of boost.range.
Please be sure to coordinate with other people who worked/are working on the topic, then. See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/120408/, for instance. This is way too important to allow a false start, IMO.
>>>>>>
Well, I'm not proposing new iterator concepts, although David and Dietmar might be. That said, Ranges pretty much follow whatever iterator categories that exists. I won't have time to look into this stuff for some time. If you feel its important, go do the work. -Thorsten