11 Aug
2009
11 Aug
'09
6:16 a.m.
Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
That is not relevant. The ar >> and ar << don't have to be in the same program. They just have to be consistent with each other.
Thanks for the clarification. So the program in the OP (let me call it A0 :) ), is a valid test case then, and a simpler one at that, than A1, A2 and B.
In the IPC case, the program could only occur when the recieving program is a later version of the sending version. That is the same problem - reading an old archive version.
Well, the problem also manifests in single programs, as A0 indicates. There's no versioning going on there. Regards, Jarl.