First of all, the std::string of VisualAge is compatible with the standard (It seems like vacpp uses the Dinkum library BTW). So why algorithm/string/replace fails is a mystery to me. I tried to understand the code to see what't wrong but I don't really grasp the details of the implementation. For instance, where is 'has_native_replace_tester' defined ? As a side remark, I wonder if declaring BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT( bool, ... ) is legal C++. Paragraph 5.19.1 of the standard only talks about integral types and enums. However I did a small test like this ------------------- Class A { Public: BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = 3 ) ; } ; Int main() { itn v = A::value ; std::cout << v << std::endl ; return ; } -------------------- And it compiles and gives the output '3' (although I would expect the boolean to int conversion to result in '1' instead of 3. But this is probably due to the 'enum-trick' in BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT which might also be a cause for your test to fail. t
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Pavol Droba Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 10:42 AM To: Boost mailing list Subject: [boost] metrowerks & vacpp
Hi,
I need somebody, that can help me out with a problem with codewarior and/or vacpp. Regressions are failing on these compilers due to incorrect classification of std::string and std::list. It seems, that the template signature for classes differs from standatard ( std::list<T,Alloct> ) and so, the sequence_traits are not recognizing these classes.
Please, if somebody have an access to these compilers, check the singnature of them, and send it on the list. There might be another porblem as well, but I cannot figure it out right now.
Regards,
Pavol _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/bo> ost