Mathias Gaunard-2 wrote:
A GSoC student and I are currently converting a library to use the namespace boost::simd.
Some of the implementation details of the library are not simd-specific, and we would like to use them in some other libraries that extend boost::simd.
Would it be ok to put them in the boost::detail namespace, or is that considered as bad as putting stuff in the boost namespace?
We need to inject overloads and specializations into a unique namespace for boost.simd and NT2, so we could need two names, like boost::detail::dispatch and boost::detail::specialize.
What kind of dispatch and specializations do you need to share that they can not be on simd? Maybe some more context will help. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Namespace-policy-putting-names-in-boost-d... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.