"Jody Hagins" <jody-boost-011304@atdesk.com> wrote in message news:20060613115639.4a490dcc.jody-boost-011304@atdesk.com...
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:44:25 -0400 "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> wrote:
environment, where I do not have time/permission to build a library on. Even in this scenario I would rather use included version of UTF.
[...]
Could you please help me locate more detailed instructions on how to use the "included" variant? Also, I assume compile times are longer, but other than that, what do you lose, if anything, by using the included version?
Well. It supposed to be equivalent. And you get "included" version with a simple change from: #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE my_test #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp> to: #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE my_test #include <boost/test/included/unit_test.hpp> And everithing should still work as before. Whatever extra headers you had to include in case of offline library (like floating_point_comparison.hpp), they still need to be included separately. Gennadiy