24 Jun
2012
24 Jun
'12
10:55 p.m.
On 2012-06-24 14:21:32 +0000, Steven Watanabe said:
I don't think your approach is fundamentally very different from mine.
Not fundamentally. But what do you think about the API of my library? I found it easier to understand when you see the "member" functions almost as is in the template arguments, and you don't have to invent names like ostreamable for some more domain-specific functions.
The way you handle template arguments to poly::interface makes it impossible to create this kind of mutually recursive any.
Hmm, that's right. But I'm a bit puzzled by not being able to think of a good real-world example of such problem. -- Pyry Jahkola pyry.jahkola@iki.fi https://twitter.com/pyrtsa