Daniel Walker skrev:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> wrote:
David Abrahams skrev:
on Mon Nov 24 2008, "Tomas Puverle" <Tomas.Puverle-AT-morganstanley.com> wrote: If you really like the abstraction, there's no reason you can't use toms::iterator_range instead of the one in Boost. That would surely induce far less churn and instability in your codebase.
Perhaps it's better that we go forward and invest the effort in
1) Making sure that some of the Range concepts get fixed What is broken?
I tried to give an explanation last night. If I wasn't clear or if you disagree on some points, just say so, and we can discuss it.
I getting lost in this thread. And yes, I definitely disagree that the old range concepts where better than the new ones. -Thorsten