Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Jonathan Turkanis <technews <at> kangaroologic.com> writes:
sure that the analogy with the iterators library will be very effective in helping users understand these templates. As a result, I'm think of using the less technical-sounding names "generic_streambuf" and "generic_stream."
What do people think?
seems ok. have you considered
basic_streambuf<>
This one is taken ;-)
basic_stream<>
as an analogy with regex/string etc ?
I'm thinking of renaming the headers that are curently based on component names so that all headers will have short, simple names. E.g.,
bzip2.hpp counter.hpp gzip.hpp line.hpp newline.hpp one_step.hpp regex.hpp stdio.hpp symmetric.hpp test.hpp zlib.hpp
Thoughts?
I like you renaming.
Okay, thanks.
-Thorsten
Jonathan