Joel Falcou-3 wrote:
Dear All,
The fast track review of Frédéric Bron's extensions to the Type Traits Library is ending tomorrow.
Hi, I really think that this extension must be accepted in Boost. I would expect that the default void RET type change to a more significant don't_check tag. I have already given my naming preferences, but I will live with the the one chosen. The documentation is simple and concise. Some basic example as proposed by others will be welcome. After inspecting the implementation, I find it quite good. Some renaming could make it more clear. Rename the detail classes inside the specific namespace without using number, i.e. with a clear meaning. The use of tag, tag 2 could be renamed check_pass, check_fail or something like that. Good work Frédéric, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Review-Type-Traits-Extension-ending-tomor... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.