-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 09 April 2008 17:26 pm, Daniel Frey wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:06 -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
think of. Of course, you would still be inflicted with a vtable, but that doesn't add any per-object space overhead, which seems to be what you're most concerned about.
A vtable means that the per-object size *does* grow, since each object needs a pointer to the vtable.
Oh, yeah. Well, it could be done generically too without even a vtable, if shared_ptr recognized a template class which the user could define specializations of. - -- Frank -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH/Vus5vihyNWuA4URAo4dAJ9gD9mtfHp2Azvr5ejGWAzPMiFxDACfUo2H 8nDJsrABHOCnou+rFEuYhuw= =UtPP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----