12 Mar
2011
12 Mar
'11
2:51 p.m.
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:51:24 +0100 JCK <jan.kleinsorge.bulk@googlemail.com> wrote:
[...] I think I see what you're getting at. Thank you. I'll have to think about that further to see the best way to implement it.
As a side-note, in that context, providing an implementation (sometime in the future) similar to Microsoft's SafeInt [1] would be an extremely useful addition to this library. This would be more useful than a simple binary fail-state, IMHO.
That would be easy to add, interface-wise. Just a "throw on overflow" option, for use with fixed-size integers. I'll put it on the to-do list, but I think it'll be quite a while before I get down to it. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *