"bwood" <brass@mailvault.com> wrote in message news:20060423224436.A5D61B6554B@gateway.mailvault.com...
: "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message :>"Ivan Vecerina" <ivec_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
:> It's not like boost::serialize currently dominates the world :> of persistent storage. : :So? I see a potencial for it to become a standard like iostreams now.
I'm glad you added the part about iostreams as I think it hits the nail on the head. I agree with Andrei's opinions of iostreams.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_frm/thread /86a5a3f804c84ea4/48842ae2fd029ce6?hl=en#48842ae2fd029ce6
I don't have time to read through this huge thread regarding garbage collection to search for iostreams related staff, but after his recent "performace" in printf article I wouldn't value his opinion in I/O domain that much.
While iostreams is a part of the standard that doesn't mean it is a healthy part of it. I think eventually someone will develop something better.
Let's see. Meanwhile I believe iostreams satisfy most of potencial users in target domain.
You've been touting multi_index here as well.
Not at all. If you follow my recent concern with multi_index design I actually believe it's lacking.
I wouldn't balk if you suggested adding it to the standard.
I wouldn't be suggesting anything but I wouldn't balk if somebody will. Gennadiy