On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Paul Mensonides <pmenso57@comcast.net> wrote:
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:49:40 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
2) For a macro library, do we still need to have a BOOST_ prefix or could I just keep the CHAOS_PP_ prefix? I cannot use BOOST_PP_ without bending over backwards to find contrived names for everything, and the namespace of brief names beginning with BOOST_ is tiny--especially when a library provides hundreds of user-interface (i.e. not implementation detail macros).
BOOST_CHAOS_PP_... seems normal to me.
It seems *way* to long to me.
I don't think so, it's not long. However, "chaos" doesn't mean anything so I'd prefer a more descriptive name... maybe for pp meta-programming: BOOST_PPMETA or: BOOST_METAPP Note these opinions are all very subjective... --Lorenzo