Re: [boost] Pimpl library in the file vault

Rob Stewart wrote:

From: Caleb Epstein <caleb.epstein@gmail.com>

...

Ergo I restate my case that this library should NOT be called Pimpl. Maybe PimplHolder or something like that, but calling it Pimpl confuses at least two people :-)

I was never confused as to whether this library would magically implement the impl class, though I think Asger may have flirted with the idea of forwarding functions. Nevertheless, I can see calling the class pimpl_ptr, if that suffix would clarify matters for you.

Let's not forget that the first P in pimpl stands for 'pointer'. :-)