Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
[...]
I think globally changing to -pt is not worth the potential hassle: after all, it's just one test that's having problems. What I can do is tweak my Jamfile (you're using v1, right?) so as to use -pt in this particular case, only. Would you be available to locally test such a Jamfile?
I'm using both V1 and V2, but the release will be done with V2 I believe.
But I'm not sure if changing the instantiation model for just one test is a good choice. Let me try the global switch to -pt first, maybe it will look better this time...
Joaquín, currently I think the most viable solution is to mark the failure as expected. I'm still in the progress of evaluating a switch to -pt, but this will take more time. Maybe you can put an explanation into the markup, something like: "This test fails because of limitations in the template instantiation model of the compiler used (-timplicit_local), which causes two static objects of the type extended_type_info_typeid<boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<int>
to be created. It could be made to pass by using another template instantiation model, but this is currently not feasible."
Feel free to reword it to suit your taste... :-) Markus