I have to say I don't get the point of such a review. Boost has never had a requirement that a library support anything other than the latest available C++ standard. Given that C++11+ has facilities that make library writing easier (especially for more difficult libraries), I would expect that almost any library not in Boost would be built using C++11+ facilities. So what is the point of making such a list? C++ libraries are defined by their public interfaces. The implementation is (or should be) irrelevant to the user. Since C++ evolution places high value on maintaining backward compatibility, Users shouldn't see any effects from the emergence of any C++11+ version. Again, I just don't see what the point of such a review would be? How would it be useful or relevant to any user or library developer? I know you've got lot's of interesting ideas. You might want to pick a different one to give a talk on. Robert Ramey -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/List-of-C-11-only-Boost-libraries-and-the... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.