28 Apr
2004
28 Apr
'04
7:26 p.m.
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
This is about how I expect it to work. But from this description it's unclear:
1. Why would you need to save counter into archive? After all value 10 has nothing to do with resulting 5. 2. Why would you need direct access to shared_ptr counter? After all using regular shared_ptr copy would automatically bump it to proper value.
I remember my initial implementation just restored the original state. Thinking better of it I made a change to the current system. Now that you mention it, it wouldn't seem to need the counter anymore. Just for laughs I commented out the serialization of the counter and if failed to build the test. I'll have to look into it. Robert Ramey