25 May
2005
25 May
'05
4:11 p.m.
On May 25, 2005, at 11:39 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
Can arguments to compressed_pair be const-qualified? The documentation only lists this restriction:
Note that compressed_pair can not be instantiated if either of the template arguments is a union type, unless there is compiler support for boost::is_union, or if boost::is_union is specialised for the union type.
I believe I am getting an error from Intel C++ when an argument to compressed_pair is const. The question is whether we need a workaround in compressed_pair.hpp or a change to the html documentation.
I don't see any reason for compressed_pair to have different behavior than pair with respect to const (i.e. a const member must be initialized). -Howard