6 Oct
2004
6 Oct
'04
2:46 p.m.
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:36:17 +0300, Peter Dimov <pdimov@mmltd.net> wrote:
Howard Hinnant wrote:
On Oct 5, 2004, at 6:21 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
(I now like Howard Hinnant's suggested "unique_ptr", though he seems to be leaning toward "sole_ptr" now.)
I am sooooooooo fickle! :-)
FWIW, sole_ptr doesn't look very appealing to this non-native speaker. ;-)
unique_ptr isn't much better but at least I can associate it with shared_ptr::unique().
Perhaps lone_ptr? -- Caleb Epstein caleb.epstein@gmail.com