
10 Aug
2007
10 Aug
'07
12:21 p.m.
Kim Barrett <kab <at> irobot.com> writes:
I wouldn't. When I said "backward compatibility variants" I meant macros with different names, with the "good" names used by the variadic versions.
OK, I didn't realize that.
So something like BOOST_SCOPE_EXIT_PPSEQ (with no preference intended for that specific naming convention).
Not sure that people will like it. The macro is already long so adding a suffix to it would make it harder to type and read. Don't forget the library also supports BOOST_SCOPE_EXIT_TRY, BOOST_SCOPE_EXIT_TPL and even BOOST_SCOPE_EXIT_TRY_TPL. Have a nice vacation! -- Alexander