On 9/7/2012 3:37 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
On 9/4/2012 8:01 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
The question is: should we allow SFINAE for result_of. I think now that we should.
I made a case for this on the committee reflectors. They generally seem to like the idea. In short: you were right, Joel. I'm now generally in favor of changing result_of. Boost result_of can be existing practice for (hopefully) a future change in the standard. Daniel, is this something you're also interested in? I can see about a patch.
Joel, since this is essentially your idea, would you be interested in co-authoring a paper for the committee? I don't anticipate it would have to be very long or elaborate.
It'll be an honor to co-author a paper with you.
Also, apologies for my defensiveness earlier.
No need for apologies. I just wanted to say that we need to keep a jovial spirit here in boost. We are all volunteers. We all make mistakes. Apologies for the xkcd-ish comment. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://boost-spirit.com