Daniel James wrote:
On 2 June 2014 22:04, Peter Dimov
wrote: boost/iterator.hpp can be moved to core in all its former glory (and probably replaced by a one-liner, using std::iterator.)
Or other libraries could be changed to use std::iterator. Is it worth adding an obsolete header to core?
Moving it is the safer choice; if it turns out that we do need to workaround
some uses of std::iterator after all, the changes will be isolated to a
single place. But either way is fine with me. Here's the report on
boost/iterator.hpp, if we choose the second option:
Inclusion report for