At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:21:10 -0700, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Domagoj Saric <domagoj.saric@littleendian.com> wrote:
However this still does nothing concerning the exceptions vs no-exceptions comparison/debate because the compiler still has to treat function<>::operator() as a possibly throwing function (and add/generate appropriate EH code in/for the callers) because it makes an indirect call through a (undecorated) pointer...
If you don't disable exception handling, the compiler must treat the dynamic call in boost::function as potentially throwing. There is no way around that.
Well, technically, an exception-specification of throw() relieves the compiler from such an assumption. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com