On 9/17/06, Bruno MartÃnez <br1@internet.com.uy> wrote:
I think intrusive containers would be useful. There was a separate initiative that added intrusiveness to the multi index library. I think it would be better to fold the many STL remakes that are popping up (pointer containers, intrusive containers/shared mem containers) into multi index than repeat the effort everywhere. Case in point: what do I do if I need a pointer-sharedmem-bimap?
Hi, I'm working on an intrusive dynamic multi-index container. I've got some code working which allows me to add sequential views at runtime. I wondered as well if it was possible to share code for common operations in these containers. AFAIK pointer containers are just adaptors over standard containers. On the subject of the intrusive containers by Olaf. I had some email conversation with him in january and gave him my opinion and offered to help, however as it turned out I did not have enough time. I suggest bringing the containers into the intrusive namespace and drop the i prefix. Kevin