18 Aug
2005
18 Aug
'05
7:54 p.m.
Caleb Epstein wrote:
Reading back through my comments (below), I don't think any of the Missing Features is a show-stopper. I'd say rationalizing interfaces for inclusion in Boost (e.g. perhaps using boost::xtime instead of asio::time, etc) and expanding the documentation and example code would be the top priority. All IMHO of course. {snip}
* The asio::time class should probably not be included, and wherever it's used replaced by Boost.Date-Time.
I think boost::xtime is the right choice there.
Am I the only one who dislikes boost::xtime? IMO it makes much more sense to replace boost::xtime with a convenient class like asio::time.