Re: [boost] new library proposition : lisp interpreter library

Would it be robust enough to run the ol' NESL parser? Link: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~scandal/nesl.html I just worry that it would not be sufficient to run existing LISP programs. LISP scripting has died off; I'd be more interested in using it for support of legacy code.

I want to suggest a new boost library, that could be used to parse and run lisp programs. I think of a way to create at compile time a language interpreter with list syntax, but with only the needed features. It could be used for people who need to run simple scripts from a C++ program, but who don't want to use python.