"Michael Fawcett" <michael.fawcett@gmail.com> wrote in message news:bc5bffe80604211135l41c2ecacx18105b56aa0689e8@mail.gmail.com...
On 4/21/06, Jorge Lodos <lodos@segurmatica.cu> wrote:
The way I see it, PT is the serialization library plus in-memory property storage. Perhaps it could have used serialization internally and serialization archives for loading and saving. As I said before, the real difference could be the loading and saving of some of the properties in the memory storage, without having to load/save them all.
I think you are correct here. This really sounds like it could've (should've?) been implemented using the serialization library and maybe BGL or a generic tree structure (which I would love to be a Boost library).
That way you get all of the traversal mechanisms available to the tree (or graph) structure, and all of the archiving techniques available to the serialization lib.
Exactly my point. Gennadiy