14 Oct
2012
14 Oct
'12
5:59 p.m.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti@gmail.com>wrote:
And maybe we just support the requires clause and we don't have to worry about typename or no typename in the template parameter signature...
I already support the syntax for associated types and it works fine for unary type concepts ( see http://generic.nfshost.com/generic/standard_concepts/container_concepts/cont... ),
Woops, I just noticed I'm missing "empty" and "size," not sure how I managed that. -- -Matt Calabrese