30 May
2017
30 May
'17
3:33 p.m.
Le 30/05/2017 à 16:58, Niall Douglas via Boost a écrit :
4. Given where Vicente appears to be heading next with expected<T, E1, E2, ...> it may be wise to make the static_checked_* varieties use std::variant<...> for storage when being compiled on C++ 17. https://github.com/ned14/boost.outcome/issues/53
I'm not heading nothing. All my comments about expected<T, E1, E2, ...>where if we had in the hope you defined outcome variadic ;-) We can have C++14 (or even C++11) version of std::variant. Just someone needs to port it. It would be even better if we had also a never-empty variant. Best, Vicente