On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:36, Christian Schladetsch<christian.schladetsch@gmail.com> wrote:
Apologies in advance, I realise I am on the verge of spamming and will not continue.
Now that this guy has left, I wanted to add in retrospect that the idea of the monotonic allocator was thrilling for an embedded & real-time user like me. Today we are settling with vector.reserve() or custom containers and this idea could be of use in some cases, if anyone doubted that at all. I understand that The Standard is here to protect us from making the same mistakes all over again, but we're sometimes a bit more relaxed than the people around this list. The unit test will tell eventually if it works or not, not the standard, I haven't read it. Nothing to add about the way this proposal evolved (and started) on the list... that's been made clear by several people already. Peter