-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I can hardly catch up on the discussion. There seem to appear more messages each day than I can read. Many participants and messages are a good thing, though. I might miss some things now, but I'd like to participate before the discussion is over. Am 21.03.12 05:07, schrieb Gottlob Frege:
I would guess, yes, the argument is that not all local commits are important enough.
I hit Ctrl-S more often than I commit to a (central) VCS. I do a local commit at a frequency somewhere between Ctrl-S and central-commit. I see no problem there. Many people find that mid-frequency commit quite an attractive feature.
I like the idea, too. I'm using SVN a lot and I commit quite often. I'm also using branches for most things. For those who see a limitation in SVN regarding "local" commits I recommend looking into the "git-svn" [1] bridge. It lets you use git locally and svn as the public repo. So one can commit, branch, revert, change history locally using the power of git, and then push the changes to the svn repo. Currently I'd like Boost to stick with svn and suggest people who like git shall try "git-svn" or "git svn" (git seems to have native support for svn.) [1] https://git.wiki.kernel.org/articles/g/i/t/GitSvnCrashCourse_512d.html Frank -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: keyserver x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net iEYEARECAAYFAk9rojcACgkQhAOUmAZhnmoQLwCeK16ieCVXuKJSbitYf+LYcfkF OVAAnAooY8Qwsp66KERvf91G5pDKP7hr =+dPX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----