3 Sep
2008
3 Sep
'08
4:30 p.m.
Stjepan Rajko wrote:
As far as the dataflow library goes, some sort of a "automatic task division" library would indeed be great in conjunction with dataflow, but I see this as orthogonal to dataflow. Automatic task division could be useful without dataflow, and dataflow could be useful without automatic task division. Is it your opinion that some sort of a task division strategy would be necessary for the dataflow library to be useful?
That other task library you are describing sounds a lot like http://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/ Thanks, Michael Marcin