-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 20-07-2010 12:05, Artyom wrote:
Hello,
"build" is not good as it some kind of "namespace pollution", and is very problematic for systems with single "bin" path - as most Unix like OSs.
So you need something unique starting with boost prefix as namespace.
For example all mysql utilities start with mysql prefix thus I think boost build should be something like
boost_build or boostbld, not really matter, the point is clear.
It is indeed, but I don't actually think I agree... except that "build" is too generic. This command will be typed into a console a hundred times a day in some cases, so it should be rather short. "bjam" was good in this regard, but not really accurate any longer, as Volodya states.
IMHO, "build" is a very generic name.
Maybe something like "bbuild" (where the first "b" stands for Boost) might just help me to remember this is a boost related tool
Cheers,
-- Marco _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Agree. It's too much generic.
Some additional suggestions:
boostb bmake bbv2 mkbb
My preference would be for "bmake" although "mkbb" is also ok. My first thought there was "make boost build?" though, and that's not what it does. But either is both distinctive and easy to type, so... +1 for bmake (or mkbb). - -1 for boost_build! /Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMRXgsAAoJEKd8gmwzkHPJbe8H/isLWruRBhh03Dwq1r0esR2D GwA2K5/r4/e6RsO2eaZ4Q66hJC4cQv8/iMEiMzvCb4kY35U4w9HMVjSW9b9gDxDB wSZnQ3O1gT8H+eS1bnFE+7pUxiOoLmiTltXMMAkRsVsNtbjFlAlhV5qc0lpJ0taj ntGrBZI1J0vylpMH5sA5gaSWi5e6yXA1nKvnzWJi2KmoCNMlaFrtgDJ20MaciPnb T03BXgAwobdSIgsfhNv2smCwkHP4yd5unzCSEBeTGKIhb3JMUCs/qeDxwj/+Qnhx 8IjukwN4GpcTaAtUaEFcfRaYeYQTz5nMXJN68pfl3RE5FkEMAw07u2AZyGiZsgc= =+9Y4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----