16 Jun
2006
16 Jun
'06
10:19 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval@yahoo.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case. What's nonconformant about these checked iterators (apart from the warnings, which are annoying, but not nonconformant)?
They don't meet the complexity requirements (big-O) for iterators.
Do you happen to have a readily available link to any paper (Microsoft's or other) describing the complexity differences between the standard and its checked iterators? I tried to search MSDN, and google a bit, but found nothing...