On 20/12/2012 10:59, Tim Blechmann wrote:
hi,
* We welcome comments, questions and random requests/rants/bug reports as to polish the library before actual submission to the boost review. Such comments can be sent there, on our nt2-dev Google groups or in the nt2 issue tracker. in a way it is hard to comment on the library, as the documentation does not really exist, still some questions/thoughts, maybe i've missed something in the slides/paper ... didn't have a look at the code, yet:
We're working hard ot get a doc rolling ASAP
* does boost.simd support horizontal operations (fold/reduce/accumulate)?
The reduction toolbox provides vector horizontal operation. You can then run std::accumulate with a proper functor and have the simd_iterator kicks in and vectorize your large data reduction.
* is it possible to define simd kernels for both packs and scalars e.g. to make use of branches in the scalar implementation used in preroll/postroll of unrolled loops?
All operations on pack are also defined on scalar so if you write a polymorphic template functor, it will work on both. There is a simple example of this in the paper.
* does boost.simd have any facility to do loop unrolling? in my library, i'm unrolling loops by the size of a cache line and try to avoid read-after-write hazards by pre-loading data.
We have a primitive one but it is not yet fully promoted as part of the API.
* how does boost.simd deal with stack alignment? on win32 i ended up compiling with -mstackrealign, though it is said not to be the best solution (didn't have a closer look)
Good question, IIRC we tried ot satisfy the ABI requirement of passing SIMD type in structures over to functions properly by either usign references at the upper level and then work with register type as soon as possible. This is still suboptimal in some cases. Maybe Mathias can give you more insight on this subject.