Darryl Green wrote:
John Torjo <john.lists <at> torjo.com> writes:
Hi Darryl,
Sorry for the late reply...
No worries.
I really like the sink concept. I could do something like:
get_sink("app.*").set_level(LEVEL_DEBUG); get_sink("app.*").add_appender(some_appender); get_sink("app.*").del_appender(some_appender);
Something like that, yes. Though I would spell it log_mgr.add_appender("app.*", some_appender) or (if a singleton log_mgr) get_log_mgr().add_appender("app.*", some_appender)
The reason I chose the above was for extensibility - every new feature would be appended to the sink -- much easier to find, IMO. Best, John -- John Torjo, Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal -- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all -- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/ -v1.6.3 (Resource Splitter) -- http://www.torjo.com/cb/ - Click, Build, Run!