13 Oct
2012
13 Oct
'12
10:18 p.m.
On Oct 13, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 13, 2012 1:19 PM, "Rob Stewart" <robertstewart@comcast.net> wrote:
Fair enough. Perhaps, we could absract away Boost.Thread from both libraries? Seems like a logical solution for a case like this.
This seems like a nice idea, but isn't the reason for the switch to Chrono C++11 compatibility?
This is probably true. However, AFAIK Boost.Thread does not work with std::chrono.
True, but Boost.Chrono emulates std::chrono AFAIK. ___ Rob