17 Feb
2004
17 Feb
'04
11:09 p.m.
Bjorn.Karlsson@readsoft.com wrote:
From: Michael Glassford [mailto:glassfordm@hotmail.com] Checking for overflow isn't needed in this case, since the underlying type is unsigned (and unsigned integer arithmetic does not overflow [per ยง3.9.1.4]).
Thanks! Perhaps that's why the reference to this problem, which I vaguely (and perhaps incorrectly) remember being in an early version of the source for the barrier class, was removed.
Bjorn _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost