Re: [boost] windows.h

Brian E. Coggins wrote:

I know sometimes it is hard to avoid, but for windows.h - which is notorious for these problems - it would seem like it would be worth some contortions in the implementation to avoid this. I would be more than happy to compile and link some extra CPP files to keep the HPP files clean.

Seconded. I've had to wrap some places where I use boost, just to isolate them from other parts of the codebase. Rather than thousands of developers individually doing this, it would seem preferable and more efficient for boost to do it. Matt