Re: [boost] [review] [sort] Sort library review manager results

On November 28, 2014 6:31:33 AM EST, Steven Ross wrote:

On Thu Nov 27 2014 at 12:01:29 PM Edward Diener wrote:

...

Do you mean a directory structure of:

boost libs algorithm sort spreadsort ... possible other sorts

? [snip]

I think we want to keep it a separate library from algorithms for compatibility with modular boost. boost/libs/spreadsort is fine with me.

On what do you base that conclusion?

An alternative structure would be to have a boost/libs/sort/spreadsort structure, but in that case I'd be maintaining future sort contributions in addition to spreadsort to keep it one coherent library (which I'm willing to do).

Thanks for offering to do that. However, I fail to understand how you think multiple sub-libraries under boost/libs/sort will be more tenable than the same under boost/libs/algorithm/sort. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)